TWN
Info Service on WTO and Trade Issues (Apr18/16)
24 April 2018
Third World Network
Russia joins in seeking consultations on US S.232 actions
Published in SUNS #8667 dated 23 April 2018
Geneva, 20 Apr (Kanaga Raja) - The Russian Federation has now joined
what appears to be a growing list of countries seeking consultations
with the United States under Article 12.3 of the WTO's Agreement on
Safeguards over the additional tariffs imposed by the United States
on imports of certain steel and aluminium products.
The request for consultations was submitted by the Russian Federation
to the Committee on Safeguards on 19 April 2018.
It thus now joins China, the European Union and India in requesting
consultations with the United States over its measures following the
Presidential Proclamations on Steel and Aluminium issued by President
Donald Trump under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962
imposing additional tariffs on these products.
In imposing the additional duties on steel and aluminum imports (25%
for steel and 10% for aluminium) under Section 232, but granting exemptions
from the additional tariffs to some of its strategic allies, the US
has claimed that it was doing so on grounds of "national security".
However, China, the European Union, India, and now the Russian Federation,
have categorically refuted the US claims of instituting these S.232
measures on grounds of "national security", arguing instead
that these measures are in essence "safeguard" actions under
the WTO's Agreement on Safeguards.
(See SUNS #8656 dated 6 April 2018, SUNS #8660 dated 12 April 2018,
SUNS #8664 dated 18 April 2018, and SUNS #8665 dated 19 April 2018).
Meanwhile, the United States has advised the European Union and India
that while it was ready to consult with them, the steel and aluminum
tariff measures were not "safeguard measures" and thus are
not covered by the consultation provisions of the Safeguards Agreement.
In its request for consultations with the United States (G/SG/181),
the Russian Federation said that on 8 March 2018, the United States
adopted "safeguard" measures on imports of certain steel
and aluminium products.
The form of measures is a tariff increase by 25% for steel products
and 10% for aluminium products. Measures are effective from 23 March
2018 with unlimited duration.
The Russian Federation underlined that although the United States
presented the measures at issue as being adopted to address the threat
that imports of steel and aluminium pose to the US national security,
"they are in essence safeguard measures," and the Agreement
on Safeguards and Article XIX of the General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994) are applicable to them.
The Russian Federation also pointed out that the United States did
not provide notification to the WTO Committee on Safeguards, under
paragraph 1(c) of Article 12 of the Agreement on Safeguards, on taking
a decision to apply the safeguard measures.
The Russian Federation said it is a WTO Member that has "a substantial
interest" as exporter of the products subject to the safeguard
measures.
Therefore, the Russian Federation requests consultations with the
United States under paragraph 3 of Article 12 of the Agreement on
Safeguards and paragraph 2 of Article XIX of the GATT 1994.
"The aim of the consultations is, inter alia, to exchange views
on the measures and to reach an understanding on ways to achieve the
objective set out in paragraph 1 of Article 8 of the Agreement on
Safeguards," said the Russian Federation.
[Article 12.3 of the WTO Agreement on Safeguards states: "A Member
proposing to apply or extend a safeguard measure shall provide adequate
opportunity f or prior consultations with those Members having a substantial
interest as exporters of the product concerned, with a view to, inter
alia, reviewing the information provided under paragraph 2, exchanging
views on the measure and reaching an understanding on ways to achieve
the objective set out in paragraph 1 of Article 8."
[Article 8.1 states: "A Member proposing to apply a safeguard
measure or se eking an extension of a safeguard measure shall endeavour
to maintain a substantially equivalent level of concessions and other
obligations to that existing under GATT 1994 between it and the exporting
Members which would be affected by such a measure, in accordance with
the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 12. To achieve this objective,
the Members concerned may agree on any adequate mea ns of trade compensation
for the adverse effects of the measure on their trade ."]
In its communication, the Russian Federation suggested holding consultation
s as soon as possible and it looked forward to an early reply from
the United States in order to agree on the date and venue of the consultations.
"The Russian Federation reserves all its rights under the Agreement
Establishing the World Trade Organization and its Annexes, including
the Agreement on Safeguards and the GATT 1994," the communication
concluded.
US RESPONSE TO EU AND INDIA REQUESTS
Meanwhile, in two separate communications to the European Union and
India with respect to their requests for consultations under Article
12.3 of the Safeguards Agreement, the United States said it was "open
to discuss" the issue, but on the condition that these discussions
would not be under the Agreement on Safeguards.
In its one-page communication to the European Union dated 18 April
2018 (G/SG/178), the United States said that it has received the European
Union's request for consultations under Article 12.3 of the Agreement
on Safeguards with respect to the Proclamations issued with respect
to steel and aluminum on 8 March 2018.
The United States said that the premise for the European Union's request
for consultations under Article 12.3 of the Agreement on Safeguards
is that the Steel and Aluminum Proclamations are safeguard measures
for purposes of that Agreement.
The United States said that the President issued the Steel and Aluminum
Proclamations pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of
1962, under which the President determined that tariffs are necessary
to adjust imports of steel and aluminum articles that threaten to
impair the national security of the United States.
"These actions are not safeguard measures, and therefore, there
is no basis to conduct consultations under the Agreement on Safeguards
with respect to these measures," the United States maintained.
The United States said it did not take action pursuant to Section
201 of the Trade Act of 1974, which is the law under which the United
States imposes safeguard measures.
It did not submit notifications with respect to these measures because
they are not safeguard measures.
"As evidenced by our recent notifications with respect to solar
products and washers, the United States is well aware of its notification
obligations f or safeguards measures under the Agreement on Safeguards,"
said the US communication.
Article 12.3 of the Agreement on Safeguards states that a "Member
proposing to apply or extend a safeguard measure shall provide adequate
opportunity for prior consultations" with Members having a substantial
interest in exports of the product concerned.
However, the United States is not proposing "to apply or extend
a safeguard measure" with respect to steel or aluminum, and therefore
Article 12.3 does not apply, the United States claimed.
Accordingly, the European Union's request for consultations pursuant
to Article 12.3 "has no basis in the Agreement on Safeguards".
"Nonetheless, we are open to discuss this or any other issue
with the European Union," said the United States.
"Any discussions regarding the Proclamations would not be under
the Agreement on Safeguards and would be without prejudice to our
view that the Proclamations are not safeguard measures," it maintained.
In a similarly worded communication to India dated 18 April 2018 (G/SG/179)
, the United States said that it has received India's request for
consultations under Article 12.3 of the Agreement on Safeguards with
respect to the Proclamations issued with respect to steel and aluminum
on 8 March 2018.
The United States said that the premise for India's request for consultations
under Article 12.3 of the Agreement on Safeguards is that the Steel
and Aluminum Proclamations are safeguard measures for purposes of
that Agreement.
It said that the President issued the Steel and Aluminum Proclamations
pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, under
which the President determined that tariffs are necessary to adjust
imports of steel and aluminum articles that threaten to impair the
national security of the United States.
"These actions are not safeguard measures, and therefore, there
is no basis to conduct consultations under the Agreement on Safeguards
with respect to these measures."
The United States said that it did not take action pursuant to Section
201 of the Trade Act of 1974, which is the law under which the United
States imposes safeguard measures.
It did not submit notifications with respect to these measures because
they are not safeguard measures.
"As evidenced by our recent notifications with respect to solar
products and washers, the United States is well aware of its notification
obligations for safeguards measures under the Agreement on Safeguards."
Article 12.3 of the Agreement on Safeguards states that a "Member
proposing to apply or extend a safeguard measure shall provide adequate
opportunity for prior consultations" with Members having a substantial
interest in exports of the product concerned.
However, the United States said it is not proposing "to apply
or extend a safeguard measure" with respect to steel or aluminum,
and therefore Article 12.3 does not apply.
"Accordingly, India's request for consultations pursuant to Article
12.3 has no basis in the Agreement on Safeguards."
"Nonetheless, we are open to discuss this or any other issue
with India," said the United States.
"Any discussions regarding the Proclamations would not be under
the Agreement on Safeguards and would be without prejudice to our
view that the Proclamations are not safeguard measures," the
United States maintained.