|
||
|
TWN
Info Service on UN Sustainable Development
Geneva, 11 Jun (D. Ravi Kanth) -- Amid the worsening poly-crises driven by the actions of the United States, the very superpower that hosts the United Nations headquarters in New York, the UN faces an existential reckoning. On 9 June, three women candidates vying for the world's most consequential diplomatic post - Secretary-General of the United Nations - presented their competing blueprints for the revival of the institution. The candidates are: Ms. Maria Fernanda Espinosa, former President of the UN General Assembly and former foreign and defense minister of Ecuador; Ms. Michelle Bachelet, former President of Chile and former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights; and Ms. Rebecca Grynspan, former Vice-President of Costa Rica and absentee head of UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD). By most measures, Espinosa outperformed her rivals, offering a credible and coherent strategic vision to resuscitate a floundering institution, according to three developing country envoys, who spoke on a background basis. CORE CHALLENGE Asked by a student how they would rebuild trust among the younger generations, each candidate offered a distinct diagnosis. Grynspan drew a sharp psychological line between skepticism and fatalism. "Skepticism is a question, but fatalism is a surrender," she argued. Her most arresting statistic: only 4% of people under 30 are involved in UN decision-making. For Grynspan, trust cannot be built when an entire generation is "invisible." She insisted that young people must be "the architects of their own future, not the victims." Espinosa offered a more programmatic response, noting that most members of her own campaign team are under 30 - "not as a box-ticking exercise, but for their intelligence and advice." Her focus is on inter-generational transformation as a leadership project, making the UN Charter's opening phrase, "We the Peoples," a literal mandate for the 1.5 billion young people alive today. Bachelet offered an anecdote: a young girl once told her, "It's not enough that I'll be sitting at the table, I want to discuss the shape of the table." Bachelet laid emphasis on active, results-oriented listening, warning that listening without action is merely performative. The main takeaway appears to be an ideological spectrum of views. While Grynspan focused on internal culture and visibility, Espinosa concentrated on systemic delivery and agency. Bachelet positioned herself as a pragmatic defender, focused on results and the core principles of multilateral action. UN VS. REGIONAL BODIES: When asked whether regional bodies (such as the African Union, European Union, and Association of Southeast Asian Nations) are more effective tools, the three candidates showed rare unanimity: the UN is unique, but not alone. All agreed that the world has changed since 1945, and that regional bodies are vital for peace, security, and development finance. However, Espinosa led the critique of the UN's "culture problem," arguing that the UN has a siloed, possessive culture that fails to implement real partnerships. She cited the African Union as an example. Despite resolutions, the UN has not effectively operationalized a strong, shared role in peace and security. For her, the UN's weakness is its inability to "deeply partner" with other entities, clinging to an outdated model of being the sole arbiter. Grynspan pointed out that the UN is "irreplaceable", being the only universal platform for governing radical interdependence, but its strength - universality - is also its weakness: resulting in gridlock. Meanwhile, Bachelet suggested that the UN must learn to partner because it is not "the only game in town." The consensus: the next Secretary-General must refocus on the UN's unique convening power while ceding ground to regional bodies for implementation. POLITICAL ACTOR VS. FACILITATOR On peace and security, the candidates offered sharply differing perspectives. The question: Should the Secretary-General (SG) be an independent political actor (the Boutros Boutros-Ghali model) or a facilitator of member-state cooperation (Antonio Guterres' more cautious approach)? Grynspan rejected the either-or framing outright, arguing that the SG must be a "prevention and early action hub," with the need to have a "foot on the ground, active, present, [and] engaged." She criticized the UN for becoming too risk-averse, stating, "our only risk and our only failure is not to try." Espinosa went further: silence in the face of civilian slaughter is not impartiality, it is complicity - a pointed allusion to the genocide in Gaza and the escalating violence in Lebanon. Bachelet offered a more nuanced operational distinction. An SG without independent judgment is a mere "moderator," which the UN does not need, while an SG without the ability to build trust is just a "commentator of news." She stressed that the tools exist - good offices, mediation - but the system lacks the capacity to read early warning signs. She shared a personal story of predicting a coup d'etat that was ignored by the system. When probed on what a woman brings to the role of SG, the answers were telling. Bachelet said gender matters, but not any woman - citing a willingness to risk failure, speak up, and get on a plane. Espinosa said it is "about time" and called for a "360-degree leader" who masters all three UN pillars: peace, development, and human rights. Grynspan said, "I'm running to be Secretary-General because I think I am the best person for the job." She refused to justify her candidacy on the basis of gender, implicitly rejecting the tokenism she earlier decried. THE DELIVERY GAP On climate justice, Espinosa was the most passionate, drawing on her experience as a climate negotiator. She lambasted the 30 Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) for failing to curb emissions. Her diagnosis: climate is not an environmental issue but a "development, macroeconomic, security, and competitiveness issue." Her solution: bring debt, fiscal space, and supply chain discussions into the climate conversation, with youth and indigenous peoples as agents of transformation and not victims. Bachelet focused on finance and representation, noting that the Loss and Damage Fund is "under-capitalized" and that climate finance for debt-stricken nations should come as grants, not loans. She called for a "big sense of urgency." On the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) - with only 18% of targets currently on track - Espinosa was brutally honest: "Ambition is not action." She argued that development cannot be delivered from New York; it must be nationally owned. The UN's role is to help countries overcome "structural hurdles" like the international financial architecture. Grynspan noted that 96 million more people are facing hunger than in 2015, stressing that the SDGs are national indicators requiring national parliaments to drive them. Bachelet underscored the need for "humanism," arguing that the next set of goals should be fewer, better-funded promises that directly improve daily life, not hundreds of unachievable targets. On human rights, Bachelet - as former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights - spoke with authority. She insisted that human rights are the foundation of peace and security, warning against the politicization of rights and the need to protect national human rights commissions, judiciaries, civil society, and journalists. On sexual and reproductive health rights, she was defiant: "We won't give up." Grynspan called human rights a "package, not a menu," pushing back against the politicization of international humanitarian law. Espinosa, who served as Ecuador's envoy to the Human Rights Council, acknowledged that the architecture is strong but underfunded and plagued by duplication among member states. She called for a coherent "human rights as one" approach. On Artificial Intelligence (AI) and technology, all three candidates saw a role for the UN as convener. Espinosa said AI is not just a tech issue but a jobs, security, and ethics issue, pointing to the UN's Global Digital Compact as a start. Bachelet emphasized on embedding human rights from the beginning of algorithm design, not as an afterthought. Grynspan warned of three hard areas: disinformation, cybersecurity, and autonomous lethal weapons. The consensus: the UN must close the digital divide and ensure that a small number of states and private companies do not dictate the rules of the future. CLOSING ARGUMENTS A video message from Mr. Macky Sall, the former President of Senegal, offered a fourth perspective. He positioned himself as a bridge-builder who brings the UN "back to its member states," focusing on rationalizing resources, measuring results, and making development the central pillar of peace - promoting jobs, investment, infrastructure, and climate justice. He stated: the SG has "no army and no police; his true strength is credibility, impartiality, and moral authority." The closing statements crystallized the differences: * Espinosa called for a "Renaissance Secretary-General" - a peacemaker, top manager, and advocate for international law capable of restoring moral authority, not merely "managing the decline." * Bachelet pledged to defend a multilateralism "anchored in the UN Charter," to be independent and on the ground, and highlighted the honour of potentially becoming the first woman SG - but only if she can bring all 193 member states to feel ownership of the UN. * Grynspan, invoking her parents' status as refugees (Jewish) during the Second World War, argued that in a multipolar world, multilateralism is a choice. THE BOTTOM LINE Espinosa presents herself as a transformational reorganizer, focused on deep structural change, intergenerational justice, and fearless political engagement. Bachelet offers a principled pragmatist model, grounded in human rights law, national governance experience, and a defender's approach to the UN's core pillars. Grynspan offers a systemic insider-critic model, focused on cultural change, visibility, and bridge-building in a skeptical, multipolar age. To recall: Grynspan, in her role as head of UNCTAD, reportedly transformed the body from being a trade union of developing countries into an agency serving the trade and economic interests of developed countries and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), according to several developing country trade envoys. Contrary to her seemingly "glib" pronouncements at the debate, her record is identified with advancing neo- liberal goals in global politics and economy, the trade envoys said, preferring anonymity. +
|
||
