BACK TO MAIN  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER

THIRD WORLD NETWORK BIOSAFETY INFORMATION SERVICE

18 April 2005 


Dear Friends and colleagues,

RE: GE RICE "PLANTED AND SOLD ILLEGALLY" IN CHINA

We wish to bring to your attention the discovery of GE rice, unapproved for human consumption, in the Hubei province in China by Greenpeace. The Chinese government has not authorised GE rice for commercial planting, and has to date permitted only field testing. But it appears that the GE rice has entered the food chain in China for the last two years.

Based on a tip-off, a Greenpeace team was despatched to investigate and found the presense of GE rice in the samples of rice seed and unmilled and milled rice taken from seed companies, agriculture extension stations, farmers, rice millers, wholesalers and retailers. Among the samples were two that tested positive for Bt rice. For years, large-scale field trials with Bt rice have been conducted by scientists of the Huazhong Agriculture University in Wuhan, the provincial capital of Hubei.

Bt rice has not been approved for cultivation anywhere in the world. According to Greenpeace, this GE Bt rice could potentially cause allergenic reactions in humans. Citing studies, it says that the protein produced in the Bt rice (called Cry1Ac) may have induced allergenic-type responses in mice.

Following this latest discovery by Greepeace the Chinese government is said to have ordered an investigation into the environmental group's claims.

The illegal release of GE rice into the food chain prior to approval underscores the weakness of the regulatory system. Such incidences are not new. As recently as March this year, multinational GE company Syngenta admitted that they mistakenly sold hundreds of tonnes of illegal unapproved GE maize in the US over the past four years. Another GE contamination case in the US in 2001 resulted in a $1 billion product recall amid concerns of potential allergenic reactions after illegal, GE maize (Starlink) entered the human food chain. And in Mexico in 2002, a centre of biodiversity for maize, testing of 22 varieties revealed genetic contamination in 15 of them, despite a government ban on GE maize planting.


With best wishes,

Chee Yoke Heong
Third World Network
121-S Jalan Utama
10450 Penang
Malaysia
Email: twnet@po.jaring.my
Website: www.twnside.org.sg


REF: Doc.TWN/Biosafety/2005/B

Item 1

GREENPEACE PRESS RELEASE

WUHAn, Hubei Province, China - In a startling development that may have repurcussions on exports of China's biggest crop, Greenpeace has uncovered genetically engineered (GE) rice, unapproved for human consumption, that appears to have been planted and sold illegally in China for the last two years.

The Chinese government has not authorised GE Rice for commercial planting, and has to date permitted only field testing. Nevertheless, it appears GE Rice is being sold, planted, consumed, and possibly exported in China, one of the largest exporters of Rice. Many of the markets to which China sends its rice demand GE-free grain, and the contamination could negatively impact China's rice sales, particularly in Japan, Korea, Russia, and the European Union.

No country in the world has commercially released GE rice. In the US, despite widespread plantings of GE maize (corn) and soy, no commercial GE rice crops have been planted for fear of consumer and market rejection.

Whistle blowers: local farmers

Local farmers tipped off our investigators that GE rice was being sold without government approval several months ago, when Greenpeace conducted its 'Rice is Life' tour there.

Subsequent investigations by our team found samples of rice seed and unmilled and milled rice containing GE strains. We collected evidence from seed companies, agriculture extension stations, farmers, rice millers, wholesalers and retailers. We tested our results with the international laboratory GeneScan, which confirmed the presence of transgenic DNA in 19 samples.

Two of the samples tested positive as Bt rice - a form which has been genetically engineered to produce an inbuilt pesticide. For years, large-scale field trials with Bt rice have been conducted by scientists of the Huazhong Agriculture University in Wuhan, the provincial capital of Hubei.

The area borders dangerously close to what's called the "centre for biodiversity" of rice -- the place where the natural evolution of wild and cultivated rice is at its most active, producing the greatest number of varieties and variations from generation to generation. Any contamination of the wild rice species there could alter natural rice evolution irrevocably and with impacts that may not be understood for generations to come.

Why is this dangerous?

GE insect resistant Bt rice has not been approved for cultivation anywhere in the world. There is no publicly available environmental assessment nor human food safety assessment available for any GE Bt rice. However, studies from other GE Bt crops such as maize and cotton give strong indications that Bt rice will have serious environmental consequences and there are serious human food safety concerns.

Food safety risks:

  • Rice is the most important staple food crop in the world.
  • On average, rice provides 30% of calorie and 19% of protein intake in China.
  • One of the toxins produced in Bt rice (and which was found in two of the samples) could cause allergenic reactions in humans. It has already been demonstrated to do so in mice.
  • The human food safety of Bt GE rice is unknown.

Environmental risks:

  • Non-target species such as butterflies and moths may be adversely affected;
  • Weeds could pick up the pesticide production capabilities via crossbreeding ; 
  • Insects resistant to the introduced toxin may evolve and require more intensive chemical control;
  • Contamination of natural genetic resources;
  • Bt rice could also affect long-term soil health.

Rice is life

The illegal GE rice scandal comes at a time when the Chinese government is evaluating the environmental and health safety of various GE rice lines for potential commercial approval. The illegal release of GE rice into the food chain prior to approval underscores the weakness of the regulatory system.

Those weaknesses are not limited to China. In March multinational GE conglomerate Syngenta admitted that they mistakenly sold hundreds of tonnes of illegal unapproved GE maize in the United States over the past four years. Regulators hadn't noticed. Another GE contamination case in the USA in 2001 resulted in a $1 billion product recall amid concerns of potential allergenic reactions after illegal, GE corn (Starlink) entered the human food chain. And in Mexico in 2002, a centre of biodiversity for maize, testing of 22 varieties revealed genetic contamination in 15 of them, despite a government ban on GE planting.

Greenpeace should not have to be monitoring the GE industry's compliance with regulations, and the GE industry is clearly incapable of regulating itself.

GE rice is dangerous to the environment, our world's food supply, and China's market position as a rice exporter.


Item 2

China Seeks Probe of Greenpeace Rice Claim
Thursday April 14, 2005 5:16 AM
By JOE McDONALD
Associated Press Writer
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4936188,00.html

BEIJING (AP) - China has ordered an investigation into an environmental group's claims that genetically modified rice not approved for human consumption has been sold in central China for two years, an official said Thursday.

Greenpeace on Wednesday called for a recall of the rice and released what it said were results of lab tests of rice from seed companies, farmers and rice millers in Hubei province.

``We have started an investigation of the Greenpeace report,'' said an official contacted by phone at the Agriculture Ministry's office for genetically modified organisms.

The official confirmed that some genetically modified rice was planted in Hubei, but said it was experimental and the plantings were limited to five acres. He refused to give his name.

The Chinese government is researching genetic engineering in a wide range of crops, hoping to increase farm output as it copes with a shortage of farmland and the need to feed a population of 1.3 billion people.

China has seen little of the debate that has raged abroad about the possible dangers of genetically modified, or GM, crops.

Greenpeace said up to 1,200 tons of the rice may have ``entered the food chain.'' It did not give any more details and it was not clear whether the rice had been shipped out of the country.

It said interviews with seed providers and farmers showed that the rice had been in circulation for at least two years.

The rice has been modified to produce a pesticide that can cause allergic reactions in humans, Dr. Janet Cotter, from the group's science division, said in a prepared statement.

``We are calling on the Chinese government to take urgent action to recall the unapproved (genetically engineered) rice from the fields and from the food chain, and to conduct an immediate inquiry into the source of the contamination,'' Greenpeace said in the statement.

An official of the Hubei provincial agriculture bureau, contacted by phone, said the province has been carrying out test plantings of GM rice engineered to resist insects for two to three years.

The official refused to give his name or any other details about the rice, saying the issue was a ``sensitive problem.''

Beijing said in December that it was testing the safety of genetically modified rice but denied that it was preparing to allow commercial sales.


Item 3

Unlicensed GM rice may be in UK food chain
Greenpeace finds illegal strain in Chinese exports
Paul Brown, environment correspondent
Thursday April 14, 2005
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1459009,00.html

Unlicensed GM rice sold illegally on the internet to Chinese farmers has
been sold for human consumption and may have been imported undetected into
the UK, even though it could cause allergic reactions.

The Chinese authorities are investigating after 11 samples of rice in Hubei
province were found to contain BT rice, a transgenic strain that has not
been approved for commercial growing and should not be in human food.

The UK is one of a number of EU countries that imports rice from China.
Although the amount of GM rice involved is thought to be only a small
percentage of the total grown - about 1,200 tonnes - no one knows precisely,
or where it went. Since no GM rice is grown legally anywhere in the world,
importers would not have checked if any had entered British food supplies.

The GM rice was discovered after Greenpeace China investigated offers on the
internet to farmers of GM rice that would kill larvae which bore into the
stalks of the crop, seriously damaging yields. The rice has not been tested
for human consumption, but it caused an allergic reaction in mice when fed
to them.

Apart from a potential risk to human health, the poison genetically
engineered into the plant could also kill non-target species such as
butterflies and moths. Insects which are or become resistant to the
introduced toxin may evolve and require more intensive chemical control.
There are also fears that the rice could contaminate natural genetic
resources and affect long-term soil health.

For China it is also an economic risk, because importer countries such as
Japan and Korea have consumers who reject GM foods.

A similar GM contamination case in the US in 2000 resulted in a $1bn (£530m)
product recall, amid concerns of potential allergenic reactions after
illegal, genetically engineered corn called StarLink entered the food chain.

Although StarLink was grown on less than 1% of all US cornfields, it was
mingled with much larger quantities of corn. It resulted in the recall of
nearly 300 contaminated food product lines.

The Chinese rice contamination was discovered when researchers followed up
the internet sales and collected samples of rice from millers and merchants.
Testing by the Genescan international laboratory found that 11 samples were
contaminated, and two contained toxins which were known to cause an allergic
reaction in mice.

Sarah North, the GM campaigner for Greenpeace, said: "This dodgy rice could
have serious consequences for human health and the environment and it could
already be on UK supermarket shelves. This is just another sorry example of
how the GM industry is out of control."

The discovery of the GM rice followed a scandal last month over unlicensed
GM maize entering the food chain as a result of a mix-up between two types
of GM seed - one called BT10, which was unlicensed, and the second BT11,
which could be grown commercially. For three years BT10 was grown and mixed
with BT11 before anyone realised.

Yesterday, three weeks after being told of the error by the US authorities,
the European commission was still unsure how many member countries had
unwittingly imported about 1,000 tonnes of the contaminated maize. It has
demanded that all maize imports should be certified as free of contamination
- something which is almost impossible to achieve - but many think that is
not enough.

The UK Green member of the European assembly's environment committee,
Caroline Lucas, condemned the decision to continue importing US corn at all.


"This incident casts serious doubt on the EU's ability to monitor GM
ingredients in the food chain. The only way to ensure unauthorised GM corn
doesn't enter the food chain is to halt all US corn imports until the
contaminated corn has been identified, recalled and returned to the US."

David Cuming, of Consumers International, said: "The release of untested
GMOs into the environment and the food chain is unacceptable, undermining
consumer rights to safety, to a healthy and sustainable environment and to
information. People need to know that their food is safe."

The organisation, which represents 250 groups in 115 countries, wants
labelling to enable GMs to be traced, the establishment of GM-free areas and
independent safety testing.

Mr Cuming said the rice and maize discoveries raised questions about the
integrity of the companies and individuals involved in
genetically-engineered food. "It also reveals weakness in regulation
systems. Strict safety guidelines and independent testing need to be
implemented and we also need strict rules to prevent such contamination from
occurring," he said.

 


BACK TO MAIN  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER