|
Revolutionary
youth give Clinton the cold shoulder in Egypt
When US
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited Egypt
in March, she was accorded a frosty reception by the youth who played
a leading role in toppling Hosni Mubarak. Adam Morrow and Khaled
Moussa al-Omrani explain.
IN mid-March, US
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton paid a highly-publicised visit to
Cairo's Tahrir
Square, the epicentre of Egypt's
recent popular uprising. But young leaders of the revolution declined
an invitation to meet with her, citing Washington's
tepid support for anti-government protesters over the course of the
18-day rebellion.
'We refused to meet
Clinton due to the US administration's vacillating position and contradictory
statements as the revolution unfolded,' Islam Lutfi, spokesman for Egypt's
Coalition of Revolutionary Youth, told Inter Press Service (IPS). 'The
decision also expressed our rejection of 50 years of faulty US policies in the region.'
Shortly after her
arrival in Egypt on 15 March, Clinton met with newly-appointed Egyptian Foreign
Minister Nabil el-Arabi. The two reportedly exchanged views on the precarious
political situation in the Middle East, particularly in Libya
- currently the target of US-Europe-led air-strikes - and the occupied
Palestinian territories.
Early the next day,
Clinton was given a ten-minute walking tour
of Tahrir Square
amid tight security. 'To see where this revolution happened - and all
that it has meant to the world - is extraordinary for me,' she was quoted
as saying.
Shortly afterwards,
Clinton met with Egyptian Prime Minister Essam Sharaf and Field Marshal
Hussein Tantawi, head of Egypt's Supreme Council of the Armed Forces
(SCAF), with whom she reportedly discussed bilateral ties and the regional
situation.
Clinton is the highest-ranking US
official to visit Egypt
since Hosni Mubarak handed over executive authority to the SCAF on 11
February after 30 years in power.
At her meeting with
Sharaf, Clinton stressed Washington's
stated support for democratic transformation in the region. She also
confirmed that US
financial assistance to Egypt,
which she described as a 'strategic partner', would be maintained.
'I am so looking forward
to help in any way that we can,' she was quoted as saying. 'There is
so much to be done and the United States is ready to help in every way possible
to translate what happened in Tahrir Square to a new reality for Egypt.'
Clinton went on to announce that Washington
had earmarked $90 million for immediate economic assistance to Egypt,
while the US Congress had been asked to establish a $60 million Egyptian-US
fund to support the Egyptian private sector. This comes in addition
to the roughly $2 billion in US
economic and military assistance Egypt receives every year.
Sharaf, for his part,
told Clinton that Egypt
'seeks to achieve the transition to real democracy, which guarantees
the participation of all segments of society in political life,' according
to the state-run MENA news agency.
Later the same day,
Clinton held a 90-minute closed-door meeting
with Egyptian civil-society representatives and a handful of political
party leaders.
'We spoke with her
about the consequences of the revolution and the current political situation
in Egypt,' Hafez Abu Saeda, head of the Cairo-based Egyptian Organisation
for Human Rights and meeting participant, told IPS.
'But several of us
also sharply criticised Washington's wavering position
throughout the course of the revolution.'
On 25 January, as
mounting street protests in Egypt morphed into a nationwide revolt,
Clinton had notoriously stated that 'the Egyptian government is stable
and is looking for ways to respond to the legitimate needs and interests
of the Egyptian people.'
According to Abu Saeda,
Egyptian representatives that met with Clinton
also slammed the US for
its practice of coupling its strategic interests in the region to dictatorial
Arab regimes.
'We told her that
all these regimes were on the verge of imminent collapse and that Washington
would be better served by linking its interests with the will of the
people,' he said. 'Several meeting participants also urged Clinton
to throw US support behind the ongoing popular uprisings
in Libya, Bahrain and Yemen against the dictatorial regimes
in those countries.'
Clinton was even less warmly received by Egypt's influential Coalition of Revolutionary
Youth. Virtually all members of the coalition, which comprises several
youth-oriented revolutionary groups that were heavily involved in the
uprising, turned down formal invitations to meet with the US Secretary of State.
'The US State Department
invited several of us to meet with Clinton,'
said the coalition's Lutfi. 'But we refused due to the US administration's wavering stance
during the revolution, which remained ambiguous right up until Mubarak's
departure.'
In a statement on
its Facebook page issued on 14 March, the coalition cited additional
reasons for its decision not to meet with Clinton.
'The US administration only looks after its own interests,
even if these interests conflict with those of the Egyptian people;
the US
administration supports oppressive regimes throughout the region,' the
statement read.
As for the financial
largesse promised by Clinton to Egypt,
Lutfi was no less dismissive. 'The US
has given Egypt some
$2 billion annually for the last 30 years as a bribe to allow it to
intervene in Egypt's domestic affairs and ensure that Egypt honours the Camp David peace agreement with
Israel,'
he said.
'From now on, all
foreign funding should only be accepted on the condition that it doesn't
come with political strings attached or promote values alien to Egyptian
culture.'
Echoing a common opinion
among Egyptian revolutionary circles of all political stripes, Lutfi
added: 'We really don't want anything from America
- neither intervention in our sovereign affairs nor advice on "good
governance" and democracy.'
During her two-day
stay in Egypt, Clinton
did not meet with - nor request to meet with - representatives of the
Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt's
largest opposition force. - IPS
*Third World
Resurgence No. 247, March 2011, pp 45-46
|