| ||
|
||
In
his West Point address, President Obama sought to justify his decision
to send an additional 30,000 US troops to Issue No. 231/232 (Nov/Dec 2009) Like
a Judas of old You
hide in your mansions - Bob Dylan, 'Masters of War', 1962 War
President Barack Obama's Afghan 'surge' address from the US Military
Academy at West Point [1] on 1 December was unsurprising, given the
fact that, as Alexander Cockburn has noted, 'Obama has...surrounded
himself with the same breed of intellectuals who persuaded Lyndon Johnson
to escalate the [ The decision to escalate was never much in doubt. Lies and deception Security Council trickery If
there was anything surprising about Obama's 1 December address, it was
the extent to which he was willing to distort history on behalf of his
militaristic policy. 'Just days after 9/11,' Obama proclaimed, 'Congress
authorised the use of force against al Qaeda and those who harboured
them - an authorisation that continues to this day...For the first time
in its history, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation invoked Article
5 - the commitment that says an attack on one member nation is an attack
on all. And the United Nations Security Council endorsed the use of
all necessary steps to respond to the 9/11 attacks. Obama
clearly meant here to create the false impression that the United Nations
Security Council (UNSC) authorised the Bush administration's attack
on As
the prominent Assaulting
that country was not legitimate self-defence under Article 51 of the
Charter since the jetliner assaults were criminal attacks, not 'armed
attacks' by another country. 'The
world according to The
suggestion that human civilisation ('the world') was united in support
for 'Only after the Taliban refused to turn over bin Laden' 'Under
the banner of this domestic unity and international legitimacy - and
only after the Taliban refused to turn over Osama bin Laden - we sent
our troops into 'Safe haven' mythology Six
times in his war speech Obama used the phrase 'safe haven'. Empire and inequality 'The
The
president said nothing in his address about the tens of thousands of
private military contractors deployed by the Pentagon in He
also failed to mention the absurdity of his decision to spend untold
billions more dollars on a futile, massively expensive colonial operation
abroad as misery and destitution expanded at home. The domestic social
uplift and opportunity cost of his imperial policy - the twisted misplacement
of resources that Martin Luther King, Jr. described in the late 1960s
as symptomatic of Echoing
Dr King's late-1960s sermons and speeches against the 'The president has arrived at a decision that never was much in doubt, and that will prove to be a tragic mistake. It was also, for the president, the easier option. 'It would have been much more difficult for Mr Obama to look this troubled nation in the eye and explain why it is in our best interest to begin winding down the permanent state of warfare left to us by the Bush and Cheney regime. It would have taken real courage for the commander in chief to stop feeding our young troops into the relentless meat grinder of Afghanistan, to face up to the terrible toll the war is taking - on the troops themselves and in very insidious ways on the nation as a whole. 'More soldiers committed suicide this year than in any year for which we have complete records. But the military is now able to meet its recruitment goals because the young men and women who are signing up can't find jobs in civilian life. The United States is broken - school systems are deteriorating, the economy is in shambles, homelessness and poverty rates are expanding - yet we're nation-building in Afghanistan, sending economically distressed young people over there by the tens of thousands at an annual cost of a million dollars each.'[15] 'A chance to shape their future' Of course, 'nation-building' is a euphemism for imperial assault and occupation. Look at the unimaginable devastation - more than 1 million plus killed before their time, millions more injured and displaced, and massive social and technical infrastructure destroyed - 'we' (our unelected agents of Empire) have inflicted on crippled Iraq, about which Obama had the noxious imperial chutzpah to say the following: 'Thanks to [US troops'] courage, grit and perseverance, we have given Iraqis a chance to shape their future.'[16] Yes, you read that correctly: 'we have given Iraqis a chance to shape their future.' Call
it Empire and Inequality [17] Re-Branded. Combined and interrelated,
mutually reinforcing, and caught up in a dark, dialectically inseparable
duet of destruction...the forces of domestic disparity and imperial
violence continue their dangerous, viciously circular dalliance
of death. 'Like Bush's
Endnotes 1. George W Bush also liked to make militaristic
pronouncements from military settings like West Point, 2. Alexander Cockburn, 'War and Peace,' CounterPunch (9 October 2009), read at http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn10092009.html 3. Tom Engelhardt, 'A Military That Wants its Way,' TomDispatch (24 September 2009), read at http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175118 4. 'Text of Obama's Speech on 5. Marjorie Cohn, 'End the Occupation
of Iraq and 6. Abid Aslam, 'Polls Question Support for Military Campaign,' Inter Press Service, 8 October 2001; Gallup International, 'Gallup International Poll on Terrorism' (September 2001); Edward S. Herman and David Peterson, "Obama's Foreign Policy Report Card": Juan Cole Grades His President - and Very Positively,'MR Zine (9 November 2009), read at mrzine.monthlyreview.org/ hp091109.html 7. Noam Chomsky, 'The world according to 8. 'Text of Obama's Speech on 9. See Rahul Mahajan, The New Crusade:
10. Stephen Walt, 'The Safe Haven Myth,'
Foreign Policy (18 August 2009), read at http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/08/18/the_safe_haven_myth;
Stephen Walt, interview by Amy Goodman, Democracy Now, 25 August 2009,
read at http://www.democracynow.org/2009/8/25/the_safe_haven_myth_harvard_prof.
See also Paul R. Pillar, 'Who's Afraid of a Terrorist Haven?,' Washington
Post, 16 September 2009, read at www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/15/AR2009091502977_pf.html.
'By utilising networks such as the Internet,' Pillar noted, 'terrorists'
organisations have become more network-like, not beholden to any one
headquarters.' A significant jihadist terrorist threat to the 1l. Congressional Research Service, 'Department
of Defense Contractors in 12. For a chilling account, see Jane Mayer, 'The Predator War,' The New Yorker (26 October 2009). 13. 'A nation that continues year after
year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social
uplift is approaching spiritual death.' Martin Luther King, Jr., 'A
Time to Break the Silence,' 14. Christi Parsons and Julian E. Barnes, 'Pricing an Afghanistan Troop Build Up is No Simple Calculation,' Los Angeles Times, 23 November 2009. 15. Bob Herbert, 'A Tragic Mistake,' New York Times, 1 December 2009. 16. 'Text of Obama's Speech on 17. Please see 18. John Pilger, 'Media Lies and the War Drive Against Iran,' Pakistan Daily, 15 October 2009, read at http://www.daily.pk/media-lies-and-the-war-drive-against-iran-12189/ *Third World Resurgence No. 231/232, November-December 2009, pp 56-58 |
||
|