|
||
TWN Info Service
on Intellectual Property Issues (June08/08) Arturo Barba Phaseolus vulgaris seeds Larry Proctor from In 2000, The case continued for seven years. During that time, in 2004, scientists published evidence that the enola bean is identical to at least six bean varieties in the gene bank of CIAT. The USPTO revoked Proctor's patent last month (29 April). But Proctor could still appeal in the US Federal Court. "This is an international
example of biopiracy and a badly issued patent that did not consider
the necessary requirements, like originality", says Silvia Ribeiro,
coordinator of the ETC Group in Ribeiro says international regulations are needed to prevent the patenting of indigenous seeds and foods. Víctor Villalobos, coordinator for international affairs at the Mexican Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development and Fisheries, says it has been "demonstrated to the USPTO with scientific research that the enola bean is taxonomically, genetically and molecularly identical to the Mexican yellow bean". He told SciDev.Net that the enola case is not the only Mexican fight against biopiracy. In December 2007 a Chinese company tried to patent the nopal Mexican cactus, and in 2003 the European Patent Office revoked a patent obtained by German company DuPont for a variety of Mexican maize. Villalobos says the Mexican
government plans to build a
|