BACK TO MAIN  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER

Biomedics: Misguided and Risky Panacea

  • The human genome map, the death of genetic determinism and beyond (Mae-Wan Ho)
    The rationale for the public funding of the Human Genome Project - a project to uncover the exact molecular composition of the genes that make up Homo sapiens - was that, apart from explaining many aspects of human behaviour and development, it would revolutionise healthcare by making possible exact predictive medicine, and unfailingly accurate diagnosis and perfect treatment of diseases. However, when the results of this attempt to map ‘the book of life’ were finally announced in February this year, they proved to be something of an anti-climax. Mae-Wan Ho explains why there was little in these results to justify the extravagant claims made about this costly project.

  • Human gene therapy: A cure for all ills?
    Public opposition to genetically modified (GM) crops in the UK and Europe has propelled the issue to the top of the political agenda. At the same time, there is growing public interest in the potential costs and benefits of applying the techniques of genetic modification to treating human illness and disease. This briefing examines the case for gene therapy and considers the safety, social and ethical concerns.

  • Genetically engineered vaccines (Martin Jalleh)
    In recent years, genetically engineered vaccine strategies have been rushed into common use within such fields as medicine, veterinary medicine and fish farming. Some scientists contend that such vaccines are totally innocuous. But a recent and major research report by Professor Terje Traavik reduces the ‘safe technology’ to sheer naive optimism, and warns in conclusion that ‘many live, genetically engineered vaccines are inherently unpredictable (and) possibly dangerous.’ Martin Jalleh highlights the compelling findings of the report - which make the arguments for genetically engineered vaccines look frail and move Traavik to call on the scientific community to go beyond the ‘Holy Grail’ of medicine.

  • Eat up your vaccines(GRAIN)
    Edible vaccines are being touted by the agbiotech industry as an example of the benefits genetic engineering can bring to the South. Claims that they will be cheap, accessible and safe, and eliminate the need for the dreaded needle, sound like a dream come true. But the vaccine in a banana is still far from reality, and we will all likely be a lot better off without it anyway.

  • Why clone at all?(Mae-Wan Ho)
    Who would clone a sheep or a cow, let alone a human being? No persuasive reason exists save for genetic determinists who believe an organism is nothing more than the sum total of its genetic make-up and that it is their right to exploit cloned human embryos for spare body parts.

  • The unnecessary evil of 'therapeutic' human cloning (Mae-Wan Ho & Joe Cummins)
    The United Kingdom House of Lords recently voted by an overwhelming majority to allow the creation of human embryos to provide embryonic stem cells that can be used for cell and tissue replacement. Britain stands out as the only country in the European Union to approve this practice. But is so-called ‘therapeutic’ human cloning really necessary?

  • Xenotransplantation (Mae-Wan Ho & Joe Cummins)
    Despite warnings from scientists of the risk of new viruses crossing from animal organs to human subjects and thereby infecting the population at large, xenotransplantation - the transplant of animal organs into human beings - is a multi-billion-dollar venture. This audit exposes the shoddy science that puts the world at risk from viral pandemics and concludes that xenotransplantation should not be allowed in any form.

  • Lab-created killer virus sparks biotech fears (Martin Khor)
    Recent news that a deadly new virus was created during a genetic engineering experiment has set off warning bells that the use of the technology should be very carefully monitored and regulated. In the experiment that went wrong, an engineered mousepox virus acquired the capacity to damage the immune system and killed all the mice involved. The scientists involved warned that it is ‘not too difficult’ to create similar viruses that are deadly to human beings. Are we in danger of facing new diseases created in poorly-regulated labs?

  • Genetic engineering superviruses (Mae-Wan Ho)
    The past 25 years of increasing commercial exploitation of genetic engineering in both agriculture and medicine may have unleashed the potential for creating viruses and bacteria more virulent than nature’s worst.

 


BACK TO MAIN  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER