GLOBAL FDI FLOWS FELL 13% LAST YEAR, BUMPY RECOVERY AHEAD
The decline is seen in Developing Asia, Latin America, Africa and Europe.
By Kanaga Raja
Global foreign direct investment (FDI) flows declined by 13% in 2016, to reach an estimated US$1.52 trillion, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has said.
In its latest Global Investment Trends Monitor (No. 25), UNCTAD attributed the fall to weak world economic growth and a lacklustre increase in the volume of world trade.
"FDI recovery continues along a bumpy road. Particularly of concern is the sharp drop-off in manufacturing investment projects, which play such an important role in generating badly needed productivity improvements in developing economies," UNCTAD Secretary-General Dr Mukhisa Kituyi said in a press release.
"Looking ahead, economic fundamentals point to a potential increase in FDI flows by around 10% in 2017," Dr. Kituyi further said. "However, significant uncertainties about the shape of future economic policy developments could hamper FDI in the short-term."
Looking ahead, the UNCTAD report said that economic fundamentals are supportive of a potential rebound in FDI flows in 2017. World economic growth is projected to accelerate in the coming year, reaching 3.4% compared to the post-crisis low of 3.1% in 2016.
Growth in developed countries is expected to improve, including in the United States through fiscal stimulus.
Emerging and developing economies are also forecast to rebound significantly in 2017, led by a sharp rise in growth in natural resources exporting countries as commodities prices are expected to increase, especially for crude oil.
Moreover, greater economic activity will help boost world trade volumes, which are forecast to expand by 3.8% in 2017 compared to just 2.3% in 2016. In this context, investment activity may also quicken.
UNCTAD has projected that global FDI flows will increase by around 10% over the year.
"Nevertheless, there are significant uncertainties that could have a material impact on the scale and contours of any FDI recovery in 2017," UNCTAD cautioned.
The "normalization" of monetary policy in the United States – after nearly a decade of historically low interest rates – could result in a significant shift in composition of capital flows, with implications for exchange rates and financial systems throughout the world and especially for developing economies.
It said that rising cost of capital may hinder investment by multinational enterprises (MNEs) which have taken on significant levels of corporate debt in recent years.
There is also substantial uncertainty about the shape of economic policies in the near-future, especially in developed economies, which may serve to dampen FDI.
"Political developments such as the decision by the United Kingdom to exit the European Union (Brexit), announcements by the incoming administration in the United States to renegotiate key trade agreements such as NAFTA and to leave the TPP, as well as recent and upcoming elections in Europe have all heightened these uncertainties," said UNCTAD.
Asked to elaborate on these uncertainties at a media briefing, James Zhan, Director of the UNCTAD Division on Investment and Enterprise, pointed to policy uncertainties, noting that this year is an election year for some major European countries. This creates uncertainty over future policies regarding trade and investment, tax policies, and competition policies.
He also pointed to the new administration in place in the United States, where the "policies are unfolding. For the time being, we still do not know what will happen with regard to some aspect of the policies."
Zhan further pointed to the great uncertainty due to Brexit. The prospects for investment in Europe and the UK are very much dependent on the result of the deal. So that creates a kind of uncertainty to business.
Zhan also highlighted geopolitical risks in some areas which will also affect FDI flows.
Asked about President Trump's call for US companies to invest in the country and whether this will lead to a rise in FDI in that country this year, Zhan referred to this type of policy measures as being "investment retention" measures – trying to keep investment at home.
This measure is not only for the US as some other countries also have different types of measures that try to retain investment in their own countries. That may affect to a certain extent the outward investment of some major source countries.
So that is one type discouraging its own firms going outward. The other is encouraging companies to remit/ repatriate earnings that are parked outside the country back (into the country) and this might also have some impact, he said.
This will affect investment to the rest of the world but will also increase the investment in the US, he said. "But it is also very challenging," he added.
He said the reduction of tax on the repatriation of profits of corporate earnings will have a positive impact in encouraging firms in remitting the earnings back, but making sure that these remittances are re-invested in the country remains challenging.
Asked if he would call ‘investment retention' conceptually as ‘investment protectionism', Zhan declined to comment, saying that there is no agreed definition of protectionism in the area of investment.
Protectionism or any measures viewed as protectionist in nature is in the eyes of the beholder, he said. There are a few countries having some (such) measures but it is not across the board, and it is not widespread, he added.
As regards a multilateral investment approach, Zhan noted that there was a breakthrough towards multilateral cooperation last year at the G20, where the G20 adopted the guiding principles for global investment policy-making.
They built consensus on the key elements of investment. It is basically a consensus on the core elements of any possible future investment framework whether it is at multilateral level, regional level or bilateral level.
"In the current context, in the current situation, further efforts towards this direction will be extremely difficult," he said, adding that it is "highly unlikely", in terms of a multilateral system for investment.
Asked about the retreat of multinational companies (as argued in a recent issue of The Economist), Zhan, who said that he is exchanging letters with The Economist (on this issue), pointed out that "when you assess whether multinationals are retreating or not, there are different indicators."
He said our observation is that there are two tendencies. One is shifting from internalisation to externalisation. In a sense, there is a tendency of manufacturing companies and even services companies trying to do outsourcing, engaging in contract manufacturing and contract farming.
They do more and more of that instead of internalisation. The multinational's assets become lighter.
The other trend is transforming the business model using more of cross-border e-commerce or e-trade, he said. This will make their sales offices and services less through establishment.
According to Zhan, it is a change of mode of operation. But they are still coordinating the global value chains. The global value chain is still under the common governance of the multinational companies, he said.
According to the UNCTAD report, the decline in FDI flows in 2016 was not equally shared across regions, reflecting the heterogeneous impact of the current economic environment on countries worldwide.
Equity investments at the global level were boosted by a 13% increase in the value of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As), which rose to their highest level since 2007, reaching US$831 billion.
The value of greenfield projects announcements reached an estimated US$810 billion – a 5% rise from the previous year, although this was largely due to a number of very large projects announced in a handful of countries.
At the regional level, falling flows to Europe (-29%), Developing Asia and Oceania (-22%), Latin America and the Caribbean (-19%) and Africa (-5%) reduced the global total.
In contrast, FDI flows rebounded among transition economies (38%) and more than doubled in other developed economies, thanks to a strong recovery of investment in Australia and Japan. There was also continued growth – if less dynamic than in the previous year – of inflows in North America.
As a result of these regional differences, the share of developed economies in world FDI flows as a whole is estimated to have risen further, reaching 57% of the total. Nevertheless, developing economies continue to comprise half of the top 10 host economies.
The United States remained the largest recipient of FDI, attracting an estimated US$385 billion in inflows, followed by the United Kingdom with flows of US$179 billion, vaulting up from 12th position in 2015. China remained in third position with a record inflow of US$139 billion.
The overall trend for developed economies was conditioned by FDI dynamics in Europe, where inflows experienced a significant fall of 29% to an estimated US$385 billion.
During 2016, a number of European countries experienced strong volatility in FDI flows compared to the previous year, said UNCTAD.
FDI flows to North America increased modestly (6% to US$414 billion), despite a 15% increase in the value of cross-border M&As in the region. Inflows in Canada retreated (from US$43 billion to an estimated US$29 billion), as M&A sales and greenfield projects in the country tumbled.
Flows to the United States grew by 11% (from US$348 billion to an estimated US$385 billion), bolstered by strong equity investment inflows as cross-border M&As in the country rose 17% in value – led by a number of mega-deals.
According to UNCTAD, slowing economic growth and falling commodities prices weighed on FDI flows to developing economies in 2016. Inflows to these economies fell 20% (to an estimated US$600 billion) in the year, because of significant falls in Developing Asia and in Latin America and the Caribbean.
There was a widespread downturn in cross-border M&A activity across developing sub-regions during the year, which fell 44% in terms of aggregate value. In contrast, the value of announced greenfield projects rose 19% to reach US$540 billion, but this was largely due to the announcement of a few very large investments in a small number of countries, as the majority of countries recorded falls.
In Developing Asia the decline in inflows (-22% to an estimated US$413 billion) was relatively widespread, with every major sub-region registering double digit reductions.
In absolute terms the majority of the decline in flows to the region was centered in Hong Kong (China) – down from US$175 billion to an estimated US$92 billion – returning to the levels prevailing before the spike in 2015. In contrast, foreign investment in mainland China remained robust rising by 2.3% to a new record of about US$139 billion.
Economic recession in Latin America and the Caribbean, coupled with weak commodities prices for the region's principal exports, factored heavily in the decline in FDI flows to the region (down 19% to US$135 billion). In South America, there were sizable falls in Brazil (from US$65 billion to an estimated US$50 billion) and Chile (from US$16 billion to an estimated US$11 billion).
In Central America, despite its relatively stronger economic performance, flows also fell led by a 20% reduction in Mexico (from US$33 billion to US$26 billion).
FDI flows to Africa also registered a decline (-5% to US$51 billion), with the region sharing similar external vulnerabilities with Latin America. The low level of commodity prices continues to have an impact on resource- seeking FDI.
FDI flows to transition economies rose by 38% to an estimated US$52 billion. This largely reflected a doubling of inflows in Kazakhstan (from US$4 billion to US$8.1 billion) as well as a 62% up-tick in flows to the Russian Federation (from US$12 billion to an estimated US$19 billion), said UNCTAD. – Third World Network Features.
About the author: Kanaga Raja is the Editor of the South-North Development Monitor (SUNS).
The above article is reproduced from SUNS #8395, 6 February 2017.
When reproducing this feature, please credit Third World Network Features and (if applicable) the cooperating magazine or agency involved in the article, and give the byline. Please send us cuttings. And if reproduced on the internet, please send the web link where the article appears to email@example.com.