BACK TO MAIN  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER

TWN Info Service on WTO and Trade Issues (Mar07/08)

27 March 2007

 
 
G33 Ministers reiterate commitment to SP, agree on revised indicators


The Group of 33 (G33) developing countries held a Ministerial meeting in Jakarta on Wednesday 21 March and issued a communique outlining their continued commitment to Special Products and Special Safeguard Mechanism (SP/SSM) in the WTO's Doha agriculture negotiations, and agreeing on a revised list of indicators for the selection of Special Products.

The communique said that the revision of the indicators was made in a manner to assure transparency while enabling all developing countries to appropriately self designate an appropriate number of products based on the mandated criteria.

The Ministerial meeting on Wednesday, inaugurated by the President of Indonesia, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, was preceded on Tuesday by a meeting of Senior Officials.

Some 130 delegates from 29 member countries attended the meeting. Also present as special invitees were: the Director-General of the WTO, Mr. Pascal Lamy; the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Brazil, Mr Celso Amorim, as the Coordinator of the G20; the Minister of Agriculture of Japan, Toshikatsu Matsuka, as representative of the G-10; the European Commissioner for Trade, Peter Mandelson; and coordinators of the African Group, African, Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP) Group, and Small and Vulnerable Economies (SVEs). These represent over 100 developing country members of the WTO.
 
Meanwhile many farmers and NGOs held demonstrations urging the G33 to stand firm, and they also issued statements, some of which were read to the official meeting.  Below are two reports on the G33 meeting, which were published in SUNS on 22 March. 
 
With best wishes,
Martin Khor
(TWN)
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
G33 Ministers reiterate commitment to SP, agree on revised indicators
By Hira Jhamtani and Lutfiyah Hanim, Jakarta, 21 March 2007  (SUNS)


The Group of 33 (G33) developing countries concluded their Ministerial meeting here Wednesday with a communique outlining their continued commitment to Special Products and Special Safeguard Mechanism (SP/SSM) in the WTO's Doha agriculture negotiations, and agreeing on a revised list of indicators for the selection of Special Products.

The communique said that the revision of the indicators was made in a manner to assure transparency while enabling all developing countries to appropriately self designate an appropriate number of products based on the mandated criteria.

The indicators represent the simplest and most rational approach to operationalising the mandate for Special Products, and the indicators take into consideration the wide range of domestic circumstances of developing countries, said the Ministerial communique.

The G33, led by Indonesia, is the group of developing countries at the WTO that is championing the concept of SPs and SSM in the Doha agriculture negotiations.

The Ministerial meeting on Wednesday, inaugurated by the President of Indonesia, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, was preceded on Tuesday by a meeting of Senior Officials, which among other recommendations drew up a revised list of indicators for the Special Products which the Ministerial meeting accepted.

Some 130 delegates from 29 member countries attended the meeting. Also present as special invitees were: the Director-General of the WTO, Mr. Pascal Lamy; the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Brazil, Mr Celso Amorim, as the Coordinator of the G20; the Minister of Agriculture of Japan, Toshikatsu Matsuka, as representative of the G-10; the European Commissioner for Trade, Peter Mandelson; and coordinators of the African Group, African, Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP) Group, and Small and Vulnerable Economies (SVEs). These represent over 100 developing country members of the WTO.

Inaugurating the Ministerial conference, Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono stressed the importance of a successful completion of the Doha Round. He called on the G33 member countries to effectively advocate the implementation of the Development objectives of developing countries in the Doha Round, as well as to create a fair and ruled-based multilateral trading system. In this context, President Yudhoyono underlined the importance of solidarity and unity among the G33 and developing countries in achieving this objective. The president underlined that agriculture continues to be central to Indonesia's development strategy as it is the core for rural household incomes, provides for the livelihood for around twenty-five million households of farmers and determines the survival of fifty percent of the Indonesian poor.

For ensuring that, he emphasized the need for developed countries to muster the political will and show leadership to reform their agricultural trade policies and move the Doha negotiations forward.

In her introductory remarks, Indonesian Minister of Trade, Mari Pangestu, said that "we must all work hard to utilize the window of opportunity and work today a successful conclusion to the Doha negotiations."

Underscoring the need for fairness, Pangestu said that "the fairness comes from a level of cut in domestic support and tariffs in developed countries to a level identified as the landing zone by developing countries. In return, we, as developing countries, will need to make our contribution based on the principle of proportionality. The balance would come to developing countries from an effective and operational principle of Special and Differential treatment."

Later, at a press conference to conclude the Ministerial, Pangestu said that the G33 conveyed two main messages. First, that the group remains solid and united. Secondly, that development must be at the heart of the Doha Round. To that end, she said, there are three important issues: substance, timing and process.

On substance, the Indonesian Minister stressed, the removal of trade distorting subsidy and high (and escalation of) tariff in agriculture of developed countries must be addressed, as well as the issue of food security and livelihoods in developing countries.

On timing, the window of opportunity is very narrow, just a few months. Therefore, it is crucial to conclude the round within that time period, she said.

On the process, Pangestu said that although bilateral and plurilateral processes are on-going, this needs to lead to a breakthrough; but the process must be brought back to the multilateral negotiations and be a transparent process.

Finally, she stressed that the G33 is not to be seen as the obstruction. "We have shown [that] we are willing to engage constructively," she said. To that end, the G33 has reviewed and approved the list of indicators, that would be refined further by negotiators in Geneva. "We are in the process of refining our negotiating position, and now developed countries must do so and bring the process back to multilateral negotiations," she concluded.

Mr. Kamal Nath, the Indian Minister of Commerce and Industry, said that Pascal Lamy has said that the breakthrough has to come by July 1. But the G33 meeting is not about breakthrough. "It is about constructive engagement," he said, pointing out further that a breakthrough needs cuts in subsidy (by the developed countries) and conclusion of other issues that are now not in convergence. He further stressed that "breakthrough is important, but content is equally important".

Mr. Amorim said that for a breakthrough to happen, there must be a precise date and numbers for subsidies cut. The G33 has made a display of engagement by undertaking the effort to reduce the number of indicators. Thus, the issue of SP/SSM should not be made into an excuse not to get a breakthrough, he stressed.

The Agriculture Minister of Japan said that the meeting was meaningful because as a representative of the G10, he is meeting the G33 as colleague and friends. April would be crucial, he said, for a breakthrough but it is important to create balance between ambition and reality. "Our last word is [that] the breakthrough has 'to be now or never'," he said.

The EU trade commissioner, Peter Mandelson, said that the EU is aware of the need for balance between reform in agriculture and sensitivity for farmers. Also, crucial numbers on subsidies are yet to be put on the table and "we have to brace ourselves to go into the final months for success or failure". He reiterated that while some have implied that developing countries are unwilling to be flexible, this is not true. The G33 meeting has demonstrated that it is flexible, he said at the press conference.

On the G20 request on market access, Mandelson said that every country has its own sensitivity, but the EU is now ready to move based on proportionality. Now, he said, other developed countries need to do the same. (He was essentially referring to the US). Mandelson also said that SP/SSM should not be viewed as the black box and loophole, as the US is doing.

In a statement titled "Seeking carefully targeted protection", Pascal Lamy said that the Doha Round is progressing at a very slow pace, although he welcomed the intensification of the bilateral activity. He said that this is due to the fact that many developed countries have yet to offer more in terms of subsidy reductions, not just in terms of overall amount but also in terms of limits per agricultural products. He said that all major players i. e. US, EU, India and Brazil must move and there is no time for "chicken and egg" type of negotiation where one party refuses to move before seeing the cards of the other.

On the SP issue, Lamy said that there are already several layers of protection in the WTO system for G33 countries. First, is that G33 developing countries have substantial amounts of "water" in their tariff (difference between bound and applied tariff) which would cushion the effect of any tariff reduction that the G33 would make.

Secondly, there is already the special safeguard (in the present Agriculture Agreement) enjoyed by ten of the G33 countries but used only by four members. Third, is the Agreement on Safeguards. In addition, there is the special and differential treatment. All these together with the SP and SSM, show that there is "no shortage of 'instruments' to protect agriculture in G33 countries," claimed Lamy.

He warned that with so many different layers of protection, some of "your trading partners are worried that these flexibilities will end up negating the market access objective of the negotiation". Thus, he said, the G33 needs to demonstrate that they are seeking carefully targeted protection and not protectionism.

However, a diplomat from a developing country privately commented that Lamy had quietly been suggesting that since the EU has moved, developing countries should move to see what the US would do. Another diplomat said that perhaps the EU and the US are playing the "good cop, bad cop" roles in order to pressure developing countries to make a move.

Guy Mayers, Minister of St. Lucia, on behalf of the ACP Group, said that the recent intensification of the bilateral and plurilateral process in the WTO has become rather prolonged.

The ACP members have been deploying significant amount of limited resources to engage in the Doha Round, but cannot continue in this "holding pattern" indefinitely. Thus, he called for the 'multilateralisation" of the process at the earliest. He further said that the SP/SSM issues are extremely important for the ACP Group. "As such, they constitute demands that we are not prepared to compromise on," he said. Another imperative for the Doha Round is the activation of the duty-free and quota-free market access for LDCs.

Reviewing a letter of the US Trade Representative to the G33, Mayers noted "with displeasure that it was apparent that (for the US) market access took prominence over development". He thus urged the chair of G33 to remind the Group of 4 that the promises of Doha must be kept, and that this round should not be a Market Access Round.

At the end of the Ministerial Conference, the G33 issued a communique that conveyed several messages.

First, it said that while small group, plurilateral, as well as bilateral discussions may be useful to help the multilateral process of negotiations, these must be accompanied by an open and inclusive process with the full involvement of all WTO members. This is to ensure transparency and equity in the process as well as the legitimacy of the results of these negotiations.

Second, the communique reiterated that the early removal of distortions, caused by huge subsidies and significant market access barriers in developed countries, would contribute to the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals. It is essential that the outcome of the negotiations upholds the proposals of developing countries resulting in real and effective substantial reduction of trade distorting domestic support coupled with meaningful disciplines, elimination of all forms of export subsidies, and substantial improvements in access to the markets of developed countries, including through tariff simplification and the elimination of tariff escalation which impede or deny market access opportunities to products of export interest to developing countries.

Third, as part of the Group's positive and constructive engagement, Ministers have reviewed and approved a revision of the list of indicators for the selection of Special Products in such a manner as to assure transparency while enabling all developing countries to appropriately self-designate an appropriate number of products based on the mandated criteria. The indicators represent the simplest and most rational approach to operationalizing the mandate for Special Products as they take into consideration the wide range of domestic circumstances of developing countries.

The communique stressed that while the G33 is ready to be responsive to significant movement in the positions held by the developed countries and contribute to the successful conclusion of the Round, the mandate on Special Products does not require developing countries to provide any compensation including through tariff quota commitments.

It also reaffirmed that the Special Safeguard Mechanism is an integral part of the modalities of the WTO agriculture negotiations. They understand that in absence of a safety net in developing countries, an effective and operable Special Safeguard Mechanism would be the only instrument which can cushion developing country farmers against import surges or price declines. They emphasized that SSM should be available to all agriculture products and that the import price and import volume triggers applied separately should alone determine which product needs the invocation of the SSM at any given time.

In a final statement, Indonesian Minister Mari Pangestu said that SP itself is no longer an issue, it has been accepted. Now, we need a mechanism and definition, she said, which is not easy within the G33 given the diversity of membership, having different needs.

But even then the G33 managed to review the list of indicators formulated last year, reduce it and make it more transparent, simplified to be used by each country to self-designate SP. To that end, technical work needs to continue in Geneva within the next four weeks, which would include work on SSM. The final position of the G33 would then be linked to the market access issue, in developed countries. Thus, the onus should not be on developing countries to move faster, rather the developed countries need to show leadership.

Unlike other WTO meetings, where NGOs are not allowed in, the Jakarta G33 meeting invited NGO participation. NGO and CSO representatives were invited to air their views and opinions during a lunch meeting with the Senior Officials. During the Ministerial, two representatives were allowed into the Ministerial meeting briefly to present their statements, while a group of farmers were given space outside the meeting venue of Hotel Gran Melia, to stage a rally and protest. (See separate article.) + 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
SP/SSM not to be compromised, say NGOs
Jakarta, 21 March 2007:  By Hira Jhamtani and Lutfiyah Hanim  (SUNS)
 

About a hundred farmers, youth and farm workers organized by the Indonesian Federation of Farmers Union (FSPI) on Wednesday marched in front of the Grand Melia Hotel in Jakarta to strongly urge the G33 developing countries to stand by the people.

In a demonstration that is part of a series of actions planned by FSPI to respond to efforts by the United States, the European Union and other parties to resurrect the WTO, several farmers also blocked the exit of Grand Melia, and waved the banner "Our World Is Not For Sale"- in front of the delegates' way out.

The demonstration was held during meetings of Senior Officials and of Ministers of the Group of 33 on 20-21 March. The Ministerial meeting concluded Wednesday with a communique that outlined the Group's continued commitment to Special Products (SP) and the Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM). (See separate article.)

FSPI also held a protest rally during the Senior Officials' Meeting of the G33 on 20 March.

At the end of that action, protestors expressed their feelings over WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy by shouting: "Go To Hell Lamy!" The police force that was deployed to secure the action was confused as to who Pascal Lamy was, lamenting the fact that because of Lamy, they have to be on alert to secure the rally.

During the Ministerial segment, Achmad Yakub, representing FSPI, read out the Peoples' Memorandum to the G33 Ministerial.

A statement made available to the public said that liberalisation of the agriculture sector under structural adjustment programmes and the Uruguay Round of commitments has devastated millions of farmers throughout the developing world. Rural unemployment has increased as subsidised agricultural imports flood into developing countries.

The agrarian distress has reached serious proportions and has left millions of farmers starving and landless. Countries that used to be able to feed their people have become dependent on giant global corporations, who are the main beneficiaries of the liberalisation and market opening that has taken place under the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.

The statement said that while the group recognizes that SP and SSM are important mechanisms for the developing countries to protect their farmers from import surges and the volatile world markets, these mechanisms alone will not be able to protect peasants and small farmers.

The group also said that it is simply unacceptable for developing countries, which comprise the majority of the WTO membership, to be subjected to the time-line of one member, the United States. Director-General Lamy and the US should not force a deal just so that they can meet the deadline of the US Congress. The Doha Round should not be saved at the expense of the people.

Meanwhile, a group of about eighteen NGOs read out a statement during the G33 Ministerial segment calling on the countries not to undermine the demand for an SSM through price or volume trigger. Each country should have the right to define the level of import surge by itself, said the statement.

The NGOs included amongst others the Peoples Coalition for Food Sovereignty (KRKP); Rice Watch; ASIADHRRA; ActionAid; IGTN; Korean Advanced Farmers Federation; and Equit Institute of Brazil.

The NGOs also expressed concern over emerging Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) that would limit the developing countries' capability to use SP and SSM to address the needs of small farmers, indigenous peoples, fisher-folk and other agricultural stakeholders.

They urged the G33 governments to recast all FTAs in a manner consistent with the demand of developing countries' right to protect the livelihoods of small farmers, indigenous people, and fisher-folk.

In a statement circulated during the Senior Officials' Meeting, the Indonesian-based NGO Institute for Global Justice said that the G33 should have an offensive interest to bring Northern subsidies to an end.

"The North has shifted their subsidies to the Green Box and Blue Box, while claiming to have reduced overall domestic support," said Bonnie Setiawan, director of the Institute. He stressed that SP/SSM is non-negotiable and cannot be compromised.

Providing space for NGOs has become a tradition in the G33 meetings, as opposed to the closed-door meetings at the WTO. +

 


BACK TO MAIN  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER