Info Service on Finance and Development (June12/01)
1 June 2012
Third World Network
Dear friends and colleagues,
United Nations General Assembly held a high-level thematic debate
on the "state of the world economy and finance in 2012"
on 17-18 May in New York. Speakers included a range of ministers and
government officials, heads of state from Albania, Guyana, Panama
and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the UN Secretary-General, President of
the European Commission, international agency leaders, academics,
journalists and other experts, including the former head of the US
Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker.
is the first of 2 articles on the plenary discussion.
debate calls for more pro-active reforms, regulations
Published in SUNS #7377 dated 29 May 2012
York, 25 May (Bhumika Muchhala) -- The United Nations General Assembly
held a thematic debate on the "state of the world economy and
finance in 2012" on 17-18 May in New York.
In attendance were a range of ministers and government officials,
heads of state from Albania, Guyana, Panama and Bosnia and Herzegovina,
the UN Secretary-General, President of the European Commission, international
agency leaders, academics, journalists and other experts, including
the former head of the US Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker.
The objective of the high-level thematic debate was to generate views
and build consensus, under the aegis of the UN, on a way forward from
the myriad challenges facing the global economic and financial situation
and its impact on development, including its social repercussions.
The debate sought to contribute to collective international efforts
seeking to secure a sustained, inclusive and equitable recovery of
the world economy and to achieve sustainable development, with a concerted
emphasis on the specific needs of the world's poorest and most vulnerable.
While the President of the General Assembly's office sought to convene
this debate as a contribution to the follow-up to the outcomes of
the 2009 UN Conference on the World Economic and Financial Crisis
and its Impacts on Development, many member states and groupings,
in particular, the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States
(CELAC), clarified in its statement that this debate is understood
"as an event, among several others, to be organized in compliance
with the mandate of UN resolution 65/313."
This resolution decided in 2010 to explore ways to embark on an "intergovernmental
follow-up process" of the June 2009 Conference.
The debate featured a plenary session, where some heads of state,
ministers and high-level government officials made speeches. There
were also four roundtables over two days, with two roundtables occurring
simultaneously over three hour periods.
The four roundtables were on the following themes: (1) Combating unemployment,
creating jobs (specially for women and youth) and addressing poverty;
(2) Reducing debt vulnerability, managing inflation/deflation; (3)
Limiting commodity price fluctuations, increasing production, trade
and investment; (4) Increasing stability, predictability and transparency
in the financial sector.
The debate did not have a negotiated outcome. The only conclusion
will be a "summary document" that will include the summaries
of each thematic roundtable and the conclusions of the UN Secretary
General and the President of the General Assembly (PGA). Statements
of member states and presentations of panellists will be annexed to
the "summary document."
Observers noted that the debate demonstrated the convening power of
the United Nations and its pro-active efforts to address the international
financial system and architecture.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon said that although recovery is often
spoken about, it is for the most part a jobless recovery. In too many
places, poverty and inequality are on the rise and hard-won development
gains are in threat.
The big picture tells us that the old model is broken and a new model
needs to be created for dynamic growth, which is a growth model that
will benefit current and future generations and that will respect
Worldwide, more than 400 million new jobs will be necessary in the
next decade. From the Arab awakening to the Occupy Wall Street protests,
people are taking to the streets. "We need nothing less than
a revolution in our thinking based on decent jobs and opportunities
for all," said the Secretary General.
Twenty years ago, a roadmap for sustainable development was put forward.
Since then nothing has changed. The growing scarcity of natural resources
means that more people are in need of food, energy and decent jobs.
The Secretary-General said further that, "business as usual will
not do, and that is why I've made sustainable development my top priority."
Looking ahead, the Secretary-General outlined six areas that he calls
crucial: (1) Global markets must work for all people, not just the
world's elites; (2) Volatile food and energy prices must be contained;
(3) The resilience of all countries to financial shocks must be built;
(4) Financial sectors need to be better regulated and more stable;
(5) Greater financial inclusion must be created by securing universal
access to a wide range of financial products at reasonable prices;
and (6) Developed countries cannot cut development aid. While many
countries cut budget deficits, the world economy must not lose sight
of the global jobs and income deficit.
The President of the UN General Assembly, Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser,
said that the debate aims to contribute to the follow-up of the June
2009 financial crisis conference, and to serve as an example of cooperation
for the goal of a strong United Nations. The global economy is at
a critical junction, nearly everyday we are acutely aware that there
are pressing economic and financial issues that need to be tackled.
He stressed that, "If we are to embark on a robust and sustained
inclusive global recovery that will improve and recover employment,
and address more than a billion people in poverty - we have to address
the fact that the crisis has had adverse impacts on development. Moreover,
within all countries, it is the most vulnerable and poor in society
that are the hardest hit in employment and well-being."
He added that this demanded more economic security, more jobs, more
opportunities, more justice and more respect for the natural environment.
While Member States have varied responses, "our overarching priority
must be to implement a globally coordinated policy framework that
charts a sustainable development roadmap of inclusivity and equity."
The President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, who
was the first speaker in the official plenary, reaffirmed that "no
grouping is as widely representative as the UN, and as such we should
not forget Chapters 9 and 10 of the UN Charter which concerns international
Ahead of the G8 summit in Camp David and next month's G20 summit in
Mexico, Barroso said the global impact of the recent financial crisis
was the result of deep-seated global economic imbalances. These imbalances
had built up before the financial crisis started and must be corrected
if recovery is to be resumed.
Barroso said the unprecedented sovereign debt burdens in the European
Union (EU) requires fixing internal economic and financial governance
"But much has been done in the EU over the last two years. We
are repairing our banking system, setting up credible firewalls, providing
protection to member states exposed to crisis, beginning structural
reforms for competitiveness and addressing the issue of our regional
imbalances," he said.
"The key question is growth - but where does growth come from?
The responses are of course different in different regions. In Europe,
it is quite clear for growth to come back to normal levels we need
fiscal consolidation, structural reforms and targeted investment.
This means restoring sustainability to our public finances, and moving
away from unsustainable debt-fuelled growth."
Barroso outlined three priorities for the Eurozone. First, the Eurozone
has to stay the course to an evolving economic situation. Reducing
debt is essential to rebuild confidence.
"Every euro spent on interest payments is one euro less for jobs
and investment," he said. The financial firewalls are being developed
for this purpose of investment, for example, the European Stability
Mechanism provides a firepower of 500 billion euros.
Second, with regard to structural reforms, there is work to do on
both the national and European levels. "The Eurozone is still
the largest market in the world by value," he said.
Third, investments need to be scaled up in order to accompany sustainability
and structural reforms.
Barroso illustrated how investments will be pursued through "project
bonds which will be deepened in order to attract funding of up to
4.2 billion euros per year over the next two years for key infrastructure
projects in transportation, energy and digital industries."
Furthermore, the European Investment Bank has boosted its paid-in
capital by 10 billion euros, which could provide over 180 billion
euro for project investments.
"We are not being complacent in saying that despite the difficulties,
we are on the right track," said Barroso.
"I bring the General Assembly a message of confidence, because
the European Commission is engaged in a root and branches reform of
our regional economic system. Of course, the Commission would have
preferred the response to be quicker and bolder, as we are a truly
independent supranational body. But we are a union of 27 sovereign
member states, so we have to work on the basis of compromise."
Barroso asserted that the Eurozone is much more than a "mere
monetary construction; it is a product of peace that is at the origin
of European integration. And this political project is larger than
Reiterating a frequent refrain of the G20 against protectionism, Barroso
said that "in today's world, no country is an island, and that's
why it's critically important to avoid any form of protectionism.
Indeed in a world that is rapidly evolving, we need even more solidarity
at a global level, to ensure that opportunities in this age of globalization
do not benefit only some exclusive sectors and populations."
Paul Volcker, former chief of the United States Federal Reserve, said
that there can't be any doubt that the state of the world economy
and finance deserves the attention of world governments, and that
of that of the US government, too.
"In last decade and half, there was unprecedented progress in
the so-called emerging nations," said Volcker.
"Trade and finance became the handmaidens of progress, and almost
all countries benefited from an increasingly integrated world economy.
We now know that in the midst of this growth we lost sight of the
growing imbalances in trade and finance. The sense of confidence in
growth and the blossoming of complex financial instruments anaesthetized
us in the wide gaps of imbalances between countries and the growing
fiscal deficits in some particularly important countries."
"That simply could not last. It all ended in a burst of speculative
and financial strain. The industrialized world sank into a deep recession
and a financial crisis broke loose. Recovery is slow and unemployment
has plunged to unacceptable levels almost everywhere. The fragilities
in Europe further complicate everything."
Volcker emphasized the situation in the US, saying that, "in
many countries including my own, the fiscal outlook is increasingly
threatening and political divisiveness seems to be growing, and that
divisiveness is not limited to the US. I do not need to emphasize
that we are indeed in a dangerous situation."
He stressed the responsibility of the UN, asking, "What can the
nations of the UN, assembled in this room, do about it. Legitimacy
of universal membership is important, but the fact is you have no
executive authority. And even if you had executive authority, I suspect
at this stage the absence of intellectual and political consensus
around the world would inhibit decisive steps. That is something you
could help remedy in the next few days of roundtables and discussions."
Meanwhile, he added, international bodies are directly charged to
find workable approaches to our global economic quagmire, such as
the IMF, the WTO, World Bank, G20 and the old G7, although the nature
of their management is much less democratic than that of the UN.
Volcker stressed that, "there is however one key area where common
understanding and national commitment is urgent, and that is the need
to maintain open markets with trade, finance and intangibles. Free
trade and markets drove expansion. To retreat now in response to internal
economic and political pressures will only undercut progress for future
growth and productivity."
Calling for a more international implementation of financial and banking
regulations, Volcker said, "I want to emphasize that in this
globalized world the need for certain consistencies in globalized
approaches, especially in finance, is urgent. The action of only a
few nations, even economically small nations, could undercut reforms
needed internationally. Bank capital standards and accounting standards
are two obvious points, but there are other regulations in banking
and finance that require an international approach."
Volcker concluded his remarks by repeating the saying that "These
days no nation can close itself off from global integration. In terms
of international reforms, the old axiom of the UN certainly rings
true: ‘If we don't hang together, we will surely hang separately.'
It is with this warning that my insistence on the need to maintain
open markets, and in deeper financial regulation and oversight, rests.
Every nation in this room shares a responsibility to understand and
form conclusions in these areas."
Joseph Stiglitz, professor at Columbia University, reminded the General
Assembly that four years ago, at the peak of the crisis, the PGA at
the time, Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann of Nicaragua, assembled a Commission
of Experts (which Stiglitz chaired). The report of the Commission
of Experts helped shape responses to the crisis in terms of key reforms
for the international financial architecture and system.
Stiglitz said that while the Commission's report "did not have
as much influence as I would've liked, following our report, there
was a UN conference on the economic and financial crisis and its impact
on development in late June of 2009, which culminated in the approval
of an Outcome Document that represented the first step in a path to
recovery. As the PGA said at the time, ‘We have a historical responsibility
and a collective opportunity to bring new stability and sustainability
to the world financial and economic order.'"
Stiglitz pointed out that the world economy would not be in the dire
state that it is in if the recommendations of the 2009 Outcome Document
had been followed through.
Nevertheless, the underlying philosophy and some of the means and
objectives of the 2009 Outcome Document, and that of the report of
the Commission of Experts, are still critically important. The underlying
philosophy was a simple one - that a global crisis requires a global
response, and the response has to be one of safeguarding economic
development and social gains, and ensuring debt sustainability.
The outcome document had strong language on "making the coordinated
global stimulus work for all," measures to "contain the
economic dimensions of the crisis, such as exacerbated debt levels,
unemployment and disenfranchisement," improving monitoring and
regulation of the financial sectors, and reforming the international
financial architecture and economic governance overall.
The recommendations focused on several key measures. Those that are
worthy of highlighting at this current juncture three years later
(i) deepening financial market regulation, such as the Volcker Rule
that bans proprietary, particularly speculative, trading by commercial
banks, where deposits have been used to trade on the bank's own accounts;
(ii) better management of cross-border capital flows, which has since
been echoed by the IMF. Stiglitz stressed that capital account regulations
"have not gone far or fast enough in making the financial system
safe and sound, let alone ensuring that the financial system returns
to fulfilling its critical role in the economy, as servant of the
economy rather than master";
(iii) the "paramount need" for a sovereign debt restructuring
(iv) the need to reform the global reserve system which has contributed
to global inequities, imbalances and lack of global aggregate demand.
"The importance of this was recognized by countries from around
the world, but since then discussion has faded," Stiglitz noted.
Stiglitz lamented that "regrettably too little has been done
on the above recommendations, although it is imperative that we attack
the underlying problems."
While the problem of global imbalances has been discussed in various
forums, Stiglitz underscored that the issue of inequality both within
and between borders should be paid more attention to by the UN. The
Commission of Experts underlined inequality as one of the key factors
that gave rise to the crisis. Since then, the IMF has also recognized
the role that inequality plays in both economic and financial instability.
"My new book, The Price of Inequality, shows that we are paying
a high price for global and national inequality, not only in terms
of a divided society but a divided global economy that is becoming
increasingly unstable," he said.
Highlighting the G20's failure to live up to its myriad promises,
Stiglitz said that "we need to go beyond the G20, which is a
body lacking in political representation and legitimacy. What is needed
is to put the G192 (the United Nations) at the center."
He brought up one of the main proposals to enhance global economic
governance that was proposed in the Outcome Document of the 2009 conference,
that of a Global Economic Coordinating Council, which, if it had been
created could have offered a countervailing body to the G20 characterized
by a far more representative governance structure.
"The Commission of Experts had in 2009 proposed the creation
of a Global Economic Coordinating Council, which was well-received
at the conference of June 2009. I was hopeful that the work would
have begun then. What has happened since has been disappointing."
"The need for these reforms today is even clearer than it was
three years ago. The cost of delay is high especially in a fragile
global economy. I hope this meeting will provide the impetus needed
to move forward on the bold and broad agenda that was laid out in
June of 2009."
On the state of the world economy, Stiglitz stated that the best outlook
for the eurozone right now is one of "long malaise, slow growth
Addressing the previous speaker's emphasis on economic growth, Stiglitz
argued that gross domestic product (GDP) is not exactly a good or
representative measure of social progress and development. This was
the main point developed in the International Commission on the Measurement
of Social Progress (which Stiglitz chaired).
"No matter how you measure global performance, the economy today
is not good," he said, underscoring that "nowhere is the
suffering and mal-performance of the world economy so clear as in
the labour market, where as the UN Secretary-General pointed out,
200 million workers have lost their jobs globally. In the US only
1 out of 6 workers who would like a full-time job can get one. In
Europe, the unemployment rate is in excess of 10%, and in certain
countries over 50% of the youth population are unemployed."
"Recovery ought to be about building up human capital, but it
has become just the opposite as skills deteriorate and economic growth
weakens. The social consequences of this pathway are now well-known,"
Asserting the illogic of austerity measures, Stiglitz warned that
"austerity has not worked and will not work, and this should
be clear. No large economy has ever recovered from an economic slowdown
or downturn, let alone one of the magnitude currently facing the EU
and the US, from austerity policies."
Focusing on Europe, Stiglitz warned that structural reforms, as necessary
and critical as they may be, will not pull Europe out of its downturn
anytime soon. "In fact, poorly designed and ill-timed structural
reforms may actually exacerbate the recession. The problem in Europe
today is a lack of demand and the structural reforms Europe focuses
on are supply measures, not demand measures. In fact they weaken demand."
"While the EU's firewalls need to be higher, the problem is that
no matter how high the firewalls are they won't work if kerosene is
thrown on the fire inside the walls. And that's what is going on recently,"
"How is the circle to be squared? How, in a world budget austerity,
does a nation promote growth? The most worrying issue is that as great
as the market failures were in creating the bubbles that brought about
the global financial crisis, today, the markets are again failing."
The same fiscal, human and natural resources exist today as did before
the crisis. Having eliminated the distortions, the world should be
seeing higher GDPs instead of lower ones. The markets are clearly
not utilizing its resources well, and governments are failing to correct
market failures, which is that of underused or unused resources, and
consequently, huge unmet needs.
It has been half a decade since the breaking of the bubble in 2007,
"but economies are not only unrepaired but are also unlikely
to be back on track anytime soon. In the US, there are increasingly
dim prospects of recovering the growth that has been lost. The 1980s
are spoken of as the ‘lost decade' for Latin America, as a result
of flawed economic policies. This decade will be the lost decade for
Europe and the US."