Info Service on Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge (Feb14/08)
24 February 2014
Third World Network
of Turkey's purple carrot
Austin, Texas, 20 Feb (Edward Hammond*) -- Agribusiness giant Monsanto
is marketing a purple carrot originating in Turkey over which it claims
plant variety rights.
is a Monsanto offering in the growing market for richly coloured carrots
- red, gold, white and, in this case, purple, a colour particularly
associated by health-conscious consumers with anthocyanin "antioxidants",
the natural plant pigments believed to protect against heart disease.
Most people think of carrots as being orange. That is mainly the result
of work by Dutch plant breeders who, in the 16th and 17th centuries,
bred carrots in that colour in order to indulge their royalty, giving
rise to the wide adoption of orange varieties as being the customary
colour for carrots.
How did Monsanto subsidiary Seminis, then, go back to a purple carrot
if plant breeders haven't paid much attention to them in 300 years?
A program of intense plant breeding? No. Genetic engineering? No.
To bring a purple carrot to market, Seminis went to a part of the
world where coloured carrots never stopped being cultivated - in this
case, southern Turkey - and purchased some farmers' seed.
After a simple process of selection, the company called this carrot
its own, and has obtained plant variety rights (PVR) over it in both
the United States (US PVPA Certificate 200400327) and Europe (European
Union CPVO Certificate 20050779).
The US plant variety protection certificate shows how little innovation
is necessary to appropriate somebody else's seed under PVR laws.
The certificate reads: "During November 1999, a former Seminis
representative, Mr. John Wester, purchased seeds of a landrace [farmer's
variety], open-pollinated carrot variety at a farmers' market in Adana,
Turkey. He then sent this seed to the Seminis carrot breeder... The
seed container ... did not have a name on the package, so it was named
‘Turkey Black Carrot'..."
Then, as if embarrassed by its own claim, the company justified shopping
for its intellectual property at farmers' markets, describing the
seed collection thus: "It is worth noting that this type of collection
activity is similar to the ongoing activities of the USDA and any
other seed collection conservatory where wild sources of germplasm
are collected from remote isolated areas, as they can provide all
kinds of new and exciting diversity."
All kinds of new and exciting diversity, but in the Seminis case,
it is not for conservation, but for intellectual property claims and
(In the interest of accuracy, Seminis is not correct to suggest that
Adana, a city with more than 1.5 million inhabitants at the centre
of an agricultural heartland, is a "remote isolated area".)
The process to turn the so-called "Turkey Black Carrot"
farmers' variety into Anthonina, intellectual property of Seminis,
was not at all complicated.
Turkey Black Carrot was not bred with any other variety. Seminis simply
planted the Turkish seeds and quickly selected the best carrots that
cropped up for their purpose - mainly, plants that were slow to bolt
and which had a desirable root shape and shade of purple colour.
The straightforward selection of Anthonina out of Turkey Black Carrot
was completed over six generations grown in California between late
2000 and early
Seminis then applied for and received PVR in the United States and,
What more is known about the background of "Turkey Black Carrot"?
Seminis notes: "Mr. Wester left the employment of Seminis several
years ago and it is unfortunate that we do not know where he is currently
Apparently, Seminis would give Mr. Wester credit, but not the farmers
who created the seed he collected.
Defenders of PVR would likely say that nothing is amiss with Monsanto's
appropriation of Anthonina, arguing that Turkish farmers can still
plant "Turkey Black Carrot".
No harm done? Not so. While it's true that Turkish farmers can still
plant their own carrots, that's not the point.
The argument skirts critical issues:
First, Seminis did very little to make the carrot its own. Anthonina
is essentially the same carrot that Turkish farmers created, especially
with respect to the carrot's most marketable feature - its colour.
Monsanto owns PVR to what is fundamentally something it did not create.
Secondly, benefit-sharing appears to be completely absent. Having
accessed, and continuing to utilise Turkish genetic resources (Turkey
ratified the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1997, two years
before the carrot seeds were sent to the US), Monsanto's use of Turkish
purple carrot leads to no benefit for the farmers who created it.
In this unusual case, the key details of the origin of the seed were
disclosed, documenting the underwhelming process by which Monsanto
came to own the innovation of others.
More typically, however, plant variety rights' applicants are less
forthcoming, or are not asked to even disclose where they obtained
their source seeds, an unacceptable fault in plant variety protection
laws that leads to the theft of farmers' resources and innovation.
[* Edward Hammond is Director of Prickly Research (www. pricklyresearch.
com) and has worked on biodiversity issues since 1994.]