MOORE PUTS MORE SPIN ON SEATTLE DEBACLE
by Someshwar Singh
Geneva, 8 Dec 99 -- The Director General of the World Trade Organization, Mike Moore, said here today that he would start consultations to bridge consensus in remaining areas through an all-inclusive process.
He said he was taking this initiative on the basis of the directive to this effect from the Chairperson of the Seattle Ministerial Conference, Mrs. Charlene Barshevsky.
At the Seattle meeting itself (see SUNS #4567 and 4566), several delegates had said that, to their knowledge, no decision had been taken on the process forward beyond Seattle and the suspension of the meeting. Mrs. Barshevsky's statement at the final plenary, delegates said, was just that.
Even in her own final, closing address to the plenary in Seattle, Mrs. Barshevsky had pointed out that "it would be best to take a time out, consult with one another, and find creative means to finish the job". She added that during this time, "the Director General can consult with delegations and discuss creative ways..." (emphasis added)
The following is the full text of Mr. Moore's press statement:
"We all left Seattle last Friday disappointed but not dismayed that it was not possible to finish the job we went there to do. A great deal was achieved in the short time Ministers had for serious negotiation. Gaps were narrowed considerably in a number of important areas. Ambassador Charlene Barshefsky, Chairperson of the Ministerial Conference, stated that the meeting has been suspended and that we shall continue and complete our work.
"The suspension of talks is not unprecedented in the history of the multilateral trading system. But what is vital is that we maintain and consolidate what has already been achieved. The progress made must not be lost.
"I feel particular disappointment because the postponement of our deliberations means the benefits that would have accrued to developing and least-developed countries will now be delayed, while the problems facing these countries will not be allayed. A package of results is within reach.
"The Chairperson of the Seattle Ministerial Conference has directed me to 'consult with delegations and discuss creative ways in which we might bridge the remaining areas in which consensus does not yet exist, develop an improved process which is both efficient and fully inclusive, and prepare the way for successful conclusion.' That is what I shall do.
"I am determined to fulfil my duties expeditiously to ensure the greatest possible participation by all Members in the forthcoming process, and to be in a position as soon as possible to advise Ministers that we are ready to reconvene the Ministerial Conference and to conclude it successfully.
"Several developing countries have congratulated us on our efforts to ensure the maximum participation by Members in the preparatory phase and in Seattle. Before the Ministerial, we organized special seminars for nations not represented in Geneva. Our technical assistance programmes ensured that developing countries were better prepared than ever. Learning from previous Ministerial Meetings, we established working groups open to all Members on specific issues.
In more restricted meetings, which proved necessary to move the negotiations along, we ensured that all interests were adequately represented. However, we knew this would not be good enough. That is why, in the structure established for the Ministerial, we set up a special working group to discuss the organizational challenges the WTO faces in carrying out its work.
"Despite the temporary setback in Seattle, our objectives remain unchanged:
* To continue to negotiate the progressive liberalization of international trade.
* To put trade to work more effectively for economic development and poverty alleviation.
* To confirm the central role that the rules-based trading system plays for our Member governments in managing their economic affairs cooperatively.
* To organize the WTO on lines that more truly represent the needs of all Members.
"There is no less of a sense of urgency about these objectives now than there was ten days ago. Far too much is at stake. It is not only the benefits of new trade negotiations that lie in the balance. Within the next few months we have difficult and sensitive issues to confront in the WTO. The longer we delay launching the negotiations, the more the poorest amongst us lose." (SUNS4569)
The above article first appeared in the South-North Development Monitor (SUNS) of which Chakravarthi Raghavan is the Chief Editor.
[c] 1999, SUNS - All rights reserved. May not be reproduced, reprinted or posted to any system or service without specific permission from SUNS. This limitation includes incorporation into a database, distribution via Usenet News, bulletin board systems, mailing lists, print media or broadcast. For information about reproduction or multi-user subscriptions please contact < firstname.lastname@example.org >